AdTwirl.com - Mobile Advertising Network



Mini Chat



WTC Debate Chris Mohr vs. Richard Gage.wmv

Продолжительность: 02:35:14

Добавить комментарий

Имя:
Комментарий:

Комментарии

Написал: SpangoChrikoWeirdo, 16.05.2014, 15:47

Truthers are moronic beyond words. Such debates are fun but actually lead to the the notion that there is a debate. Let me get this straight. No one planted explosives in the buildings. To think otherwise is idiotic and truthers should seek help.
Написал: Self Education Radio, 23.02.2014, 14:54

Chris mohr doesn't understand resistance... you can't accelerate through a building... the bilding slows you down.... he thinks the collapse would naturally go faster and faster... but only a controlled demolition can do that.
Написал: Self Education Radio, 23.02.2014, 14:49

Richard Wiped the floor with that idiot... @39:00 he claimed the top of the building was coming down at 100 miles per hour.. how is that possible.. where did the top of the building have room to build up that velocity. it was sitting still.. then got blown up as we saw... you didn't see an million ton block falling from the sky and crushing the twin towers... and his analogy of the weight is stupid because the 25lb weight is denser than the scale.. the top of the building was the same density but less massive than the bottom.
Написал: SonsOf Scotland, 30.06.2014, 20:54

I always try to find good arguments to prove AE911 wrong. I am always hopeful that the natural collapse theory will be explained. However, to my ongoing horror, it's always just a complete load of bullshit. Chris Mohr never answers questions directly and even refused to answer some. Instead he focuses on very specific facts that are meaningless to the actual explanation of the collapse. Chris buddy, I hope you're proud of yourself. Also hope your motivation here is to protect yourself\family vs. profiting. At least I could understand your position if the former -
Написал: drie wiel, 01.06.2014, 10:05

If it had been just the 2 towers coming down hardly anyone would question the official story. It's like this. If someone tells me he saw a green elephant I would believe him. When he also tells me this elephant played the violin while driving a car and talked fluent Spanish, Chinese and Norwegian, then I know he's talking crap. This is the problem. Take one miracle from 9-11 and it can be debunked by some miracle explanation. But if you put everything together and too many coincidences occurred. It is simply not possible. Richard Cage could be wrong on a couple of things. Debunkers immediately point it out. Like reading Einstein's Theories and discover a grammar error. Yet they fail to see the whole picture. The list of coincidences is endless. If you truly believe that man saw the elephant then you also haven't a single doubt what the US government tells you is always exactly what happened. There are architects for 9-11 truth, firefighter for 9-11 truth, scientists for 9-11 truth, even politicians for 9-11 truth. Ask yourself, how come? Are they all nuts? So if you spot a green elephant playing the violin while driving a car and is talking Chinese, Swedish and Spanish, then let me know. And oh, yes it was Norwegian, not Swedish. You debunkers really payed attention. Does that make the elephant true? 
Написал: Michael Waters, 21.06.2014, 06:45

If I knew nothing of the facts of 911 (I DO know a lot), I'd side with the truthers simply because the the believers in the official story are so mean and nasty ("Don't you dare speak for us! I know many, MANY other family members, they ALL despise Gage and how he's making money off the deaths of their loved ones! By the way loser, NO ONE found even an ounce of once molten steel at the WTC! Not a drop!". This ought to tell people something. People with truth needn't demean others. All they need to do is state their case. Which isn't done in this debate.. And then there are the obvious lie that "no one saw molten steel." Nonsense, the pictures of pools of molten steel have been available for years. Verdict: Gage wins by default, AND by reasonable facts. 
Написал: David Lango, 22.02.2014, 02:07

"Microscopic bone fragments, concrete in talcum powder form, and it's full of iron dust and it sticks to a magnet, on top of a roof of a tall building 500 feet away. How did that get there?" THAT ladies and gentlemen is honest investigative journalism. I'm not buying the "gravity does strange things" side of what's going back and forth in this long drawn out debate. The establishment usurped our government in 1913 and things went from great to worse over the last hundred years with each lie printed in news and each new diploma in anthropology and every single war. All wars are based on lies. The establishment censors the media to lie and create the context for war. Look where we are today. Certainly 9/11 is the foundation for all of our modern illicit war and tyranny at home. But what's worse is the establishment is poisoning the planet. Weather control has been a secret weapon since WWII. Edward Snowden revealed the "scientist" in charge of Geo-engineering believes North America will burn up in a year if we make him stop spraying Chemtrails. Chemtrails are made of nano-aluminum and sprayed at high altitude to block out the sun and the people doing it believe they are fighting global warming. We need to reach people on the "inside" and let them know the establishment exists on a lie. We're not supposed to have an IRS or a FED! Woodrow Wilson's treason of accepting a million dollar campaign contribution in promise of signing the Federal Reserve Act and followed by Secretary of State Philander Knox's fraud of declaring the States actually ratified the 16th Amendment! The establishment controls the global conversation. The establishment used media censorship to usurp our government in 1913. 9/11 is a symptom. Monsanto providing us "aluminum resistant" seeds so we can grow food is a vulture feeding on the carcass of liberty lost. The establishment is spraying poison on our heads without our knowledge or consent. I read an article that this is a self loathing syndrome these shadow bankers are going through, as they already own the debt of all the nations that they convinced over the centuries to make war, all they want now is to abide the Georgia Guidestones. And they're deliberately sending a torpedo into their own ship, Earth, to make it happen. 
Написал: ronyan1, 04.12.2013, 05:39

This guy thinks that air compression between collapsing floors created 482 mph winds inside the towers. Debate over. Done. I want some of what he's smoking.
Написал: Michael Waters, 21.06.2014, 06:23

youstupidmoron (such a charming name!) wrote: "Lets see, what makes more sense, the government calling new networks telling them a building collapsed before knowing it would collapse for sure or a news station making a mistake about a building number? Only an ignorant conspiracy nut would think "the government" would say a building fell before knowing if the mythical demo would even be successful! Truthers have no common sense" Ever hear of "human error,?" It happens. A lot. This would explain the premature accouncement. The Fixers screwed up. It happens, I've noticed. 
Написал: Michael Waters, 21.06.2014, 06:19

youstupidmoron, a charmer, wrote: "Tell me Dick Gage, how did the clean up crew cut and remove those thousands of tons of hardened molten steel out of the basements? Why did not one of the clean up crew find a scrap of molten steel? Why does Gage show a hunk of melted aluminum full of thin, unmelted sheets of steel, carpet, plastic and paper that can be still read? Gage lied throughout the debate, why? Gage is a disgusting slime profiting off the deaths of 9/11. He makes me sick!" 1. Molten steel was observable by any of the clean-up people. They removed it carefully. 2. When you lodge such intense insults ("disgusting slime"), you say more about yourself than the person you assail. Thus, you lose credibility. 3. Your first point makes no sense, so I suppose you never had much credibility.
Написал: Turner9090, 18.05.2014, 20:05

Yea I would argue that Chris mohr's ignorance is almost "recklessness"...he prob just loves dominating the world wit democracy
Написал: roquefortfiles, 21.02.2014, 03:53

There is no building in the world that would even begin to carry 14 floors in failure.. Any structural engineer knows a building carries its floor loads as static weight. It does not carry them as dynamic weight. And Gage knows this. There fore this makes him one of two things. An idiot. Or a liar. There is NO in between. A dynamic load of 14 floors would demolish the building to the ground. 
Написал: Turner9090, 31.05.2014, 18:54

Everything that has to do with fireproofing the steel has to do with floor supports...floors hold the valuable cargo...just floor collapsing could not destroy the whole building maybe some of the perimeter maybe some of the core but not the entire building...he also keeps mentioning free fall (speed) saying it's 60% slower than free fall "speed" the problem is Chris a fall is an acceleration the speed is constantly changing until you get to terminal velocity..the problem here is that the buildings were "ACCELERATING" going faster and faster through something of greater mass
Написал: AndrewChan84, 08.05.2014, 15:25

"It's interesting that the scale slowed down the acceleration of the falling object. The scale did not get pulverized by the falling object" LOL "Gravity, gravity, gravity, I keep telling ya, gravity!" LOL This man doesn't understand the simple concept of resistance. He only wants to apply F=ma from one side and not the other, lol. Also, steel is malleable, it's not a house of cards that will cascade downwards with zero resistance. Even brittle structures will still provide plenty of resistance. Stack ten plates one on top of another, and then drop one plate on top of that stack and see if the whole stack comes straight down through the path of most resistance (no karate chops please, that would be thermite). LOL
Написал: Crate Krait, 31.07.2013, 12:58

well according to JVCcam96's example. lets say you had 5 similar scales stacked together, and a weight held twice as high as your initial height above the scale, and then dropped it, what do you think will happen? the top scale will probably be damaged but the weight will meet resistance as it has four more scales to pass through (which would delay in the time)it and the bottom scale will not be even aware of what happened above.
Написал: ctcole77, 21.06.2013, 21:34

Are you for real idiot? Bin Laden didn't live in a cave. Absolutely no building collapsed at free fall on 911. Free fall isn't even a "speed" Mr. Science. 911 TRUTH = 911 LIES
Написал: lexi con, 20.06.2013, 17:47

die shill! You are a traitor
Написал: lexi con, 20.06.2013, 17:35

Chris Mohr is full of shit.
Написал: CathartikRequiem, 25.03.2013, 10:23

I don't care if you've never heard of him or not. That makes no difference. I'll continue to wait on your refutation of all of the aforementioned experts.
Написал: JVCcam96, 22.05.2013, 09:54

If you had a weight and you placed it on a bathroom scale, it will give a measurement of the weight, right? Lets say, i took the same weight and i held it about 10 feet above the scale, then dropped it, what do you think will happen? The scale will get damaged before giving a measurement. Same thing with the twin towers, because gravity took over once the collapse started the weight of the building becomes greater that the object below won't be able to support it. f=ma
Написал: Crate Krait, 02.08.2013, 01:48

but sir, if you look all the "coincidences" happening in one day, that should be enough to raise questions, and when the answers given strays away from the fact so much that it raises even more questions that wont be answered or ignored, theres that doubt circle that we all are in. We want only truth and justice for the people in america and the world that suffered since that day. Please look at the bigger picture, who controls what
Написал: HereticNews, 24.05.2013, 22:09

The idea that the upper floors crushed the lower floors has been disproven. An analysis of the velocity profile of the twin towers shows that there was no momentum bump or deceleration in the velocity profile where the upper floors would have met the lower floors. This is physically impossible if the upper floors crashed into the lower floors. See David Chandler's analysis at watch?v=i9M1iufUAVA and watch?v=ZjSd9wB55zk. So this entire line of reasoning is a red herring.
Написал: Pascalsmit1971, 11.04.2013, 07:00

Watch zeitgeist the movie 2007 and see & hear clean up crew AND firemen CONFIRM the molten steel. And profits of the book and dvd are peanuts. Gage quit his job for this, he could have earned more money just being silent about all this. And stop insulting people calling them loser. Your statements just are proven nonsense. Watch Zeitgeist, if you dare.
Написал: leftysergeant, 25.03.2013, 02:23

Bullshit. They were posted on JREF and Millette is sending his paper throuugh peer review. It was paint on flakes of oxicized steel. The is everywhere in an office building, anywhere in the world. It takes a pretty delusional doofus not to see than just from scanning with the Mark I eyeball,
Написал: youstupidmoron, 23.07.2013, 22:48

Lets see, what makes more sense, the government calling new networks telling them a building collapsed before knowing it would collapse for sure or a news station making a mistake about a building number? Only an ignorant conspiracy nut would think "the government" would say a building fell before knowing if the mythical demo would even be successful! Truthers have no common sense